Voyez ce qui change de Bronze à Diamond.

Modification proposée

Extend P1.3 so communication is not limited to service details. Organisations should help athletes understand common warning signs, when further help may be useful, confidentiality and its limits, how to support another person, and where routine or urgent help is found. Education must remain non-diagnostic and proportionate.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes how the organisation provides recurring, practical mental-health education to athletes and checks whether it is understood?

Routage / applicabilité

Universal from Silver; Bronze may be satisfied by induction-level information already in P1.3-BR.

Impact preuves / audit

Add education materials, reach records, update history and protected comprehension sampling.

Revue requise

Clinical; lived experience; accessibility; translation.

Pages source

35, 37, 50-51

Modification proposée

Where an organisation controls return to training, competition or selection after a health-related absence, it should have a coordinated process that respects athlete choice, uses appropriate qualified input, shares only necessary functional information, allows temporary adjustments and prevents both premature return and unnecessary exclusion.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes how a return to training or competition is coordinated after a mental-health-related absence?

Routage / applicabilité

Route to organisations that control return-to-training, return-to-competition or participation decisions.

Impact preuves / audit

Add return-process document, anonymised plan sample, decision-role map and protected athlete corroboration at Diamond.

Revue requise

Clinical; legal; lived experience; performance operations.

Pages source

25, 67

Modification proposée

Add a neutral context selector before the assessment asks any screening-specific questions. Screening must not become a universal MindsMelt requirement merely because the IOC toolkit recommends it.

Libellé de la question

Does the assessed scope use a questionnaire, digital tool or formal screening process intended to identify possible mental-health concerns?

Routage / applicabilité

Always visible; Yes activates RA-11 and Q-R-SCREEN-P14-07.

Impact preuves / audit

Context response must be verified against onboarding, health-check and digital-tool records.

Revue requise

Clinical; privacy; legal; measurement.

Pages source

37, 63

Modification proposée

Where screening exists, test voluntariness or other lawful authority, qualified selection and interpretation of the tool, clear pre-screen information, referral after concerning results, limits of rating scales, data minimisation and separation from coaching, selection and employment decisions.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes the safeguards around formal mental-health screening in the assessed scope?

Routage / applicabilité

Only if CTX-SERVICE-SCREENING-01 = Yes.

Impact preuves / audit

Tool rationale, consent wording, data flow, access list, follow-up protocol, referral sample and privacy review.

Revue requise

Clinical mandatory; privacy/legal; measurement; lived experience.

Pages source

37, 63

Modification proposée

State explicitly that relevant people may notice concerns connected to competitive, personal or organisational pressures. They are not expected to solve family, financial or personal problems; they must respond respectfully, reduce immediate avoidable stress where appropriate and connect the person to support.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes how competence is verified for recognising possible concerns linked to competitive, personal or organisational pressures and responding within role boundaries?

Routage / applicabilité

Universal; scenario examples should be adapted by role and organisation type.

Impact preuves / audit

Scenario library should include injury/underperformance, grief/family or financial pressure, and leadership/team/logistical stress.

Revue requise

Clinical; operational; lived experience; cultural review.

Pages source

25, 33

Modification proposée

Where families, parents, agents, sponsors or other representatives materially influence support, travel, selection or transition, the organisation should provide simple guidance on support routes, urgent action, confidentiality, role boundaries and acting in the athlete's interests. This is not a requirement to train every family member as staff.

Libellé de la question

Where people outside the formal workforce play an important support role, which statement best describes the guidance they receive?

Routage / applicabilité

Route for minors, residential programmes, formal athlete-agent/representative models or other verified entourage dependence.

Impact preuves / audit

Guidance materials, distribution records, role/consent rules and protected athlete feedback.

Revue requise

Safeguarding; lived experience; legal; cultural review.

Pages source

25, 27

Modification proposée

The operating framework should show how prevention and education connect to routine support, recognition, referral, urgent response, specialist care and follow-up. Each step should have an owner, a practical route and a clear handoff. This is a map of the system, not one combined clinical/safeguarding procedure.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes whether the organisation has mapped the full pathway from prevention and athlete education through routine support, referral, urgent response and follow-up, with clear owners and handoffs?

Routage / applicabilité

Universal; the depth and format scale with organisation size.

Impact preuves / audit

Add pathway map, responsibility table, routine/urgent branch cross-references and one traced example.

Revue requise

Clinical; safeguarding; operational; small-organisation review.

Pages source

37, 49-51

Modification proposée

Leadership should review a current action plan showing priorities, owners, resources, timeframes, progress measures, known gaps, overdue actions and decisions. Do not create a second parallel planning document if the existing P3.5 implementation/risk/action overview can hold these fields.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes the current mental-health and wellbeing action plan reviewed by leadership, including priorities, owners, resources, timeframes, measures, known gaps and overdue actions?

Routage / applicabilité

Universal; small organisations may use a short action table rather than a formal strategy document.

Impact preuves / audit

Current plan, leadership review record, overdue-action escalation and evidence that measures affect decisions.

Revue requise

Governance; operational; measurement.

Pages source

49-51

Modification proposée

For larger, multi-site or governing organisations, the participation plan should include athlete input and access to suitably qualified mental-health, medical, public-health or safeguarding advice. Small organisations may meet this through external consultation rather than a standing committee.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes whether athlete and workforce participation is complemented by the qualified advice needed for the decisions being made?

Routage / applicabilité

Higher depth for federations, NOCs, large multi-site organisations and organisations providing clinical services.

Impact preuves / audit

Terms of reference or consultation record; expertise and conflict checks; leadership response.

Revue requise

Governance; clinical; lived experience.

Pages source

50, 52

Modification proposée

P4.1 should require an emergency plan; P4.3/P1.4 should own non-emergency referral. Each document must point to the other, define the decision boundary and prevent a vague single policy from being credited twice.

Libellé de la question

No new applicant question required. Add a cross-reference check to existing P4.1 and P4.3 help text and auditor prompts.

Routage / applicabilité

Universal.

Impact preuves / audit

Auditor traces one routine concern and one urgent concern through the correct branches.

Revue requise

Clinical; safeguarding; operational.

Pages source

51

Modification proposée

At Gold and Diamond, the organisation should use protected evidence to identify whether language, disability, gender, culture, contract status or other power differences create support-access or help-seeking gaps. The aim is practical improvement, not intrusive demographic profiling.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes how the organisation identifies and addresses differences in trust, access or use of support between relevant groups?

Routage / applicabilité

Gold and Diamond; only analyse groups where safe, lawful and statistically meaningful.

Impact preuves / audit

Protected access/trust analysis, action record, small-number safeguards and lived-experience sampling.

Revue requise

Equality; privacy/legal; lived experience; measurement.

Pages source

25, 35

Modification proposée

Planning should consider combined demands such as training, competition, travel, study, work, injury, family or grief, financial pressure, media attention, unexpected success, leadership and logistical problems. Organisations do not have to solve private life problems; they should avoid dismissing them and make reasonable adjustments or referrals where appropriate.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes how the organisation considers combined competitive, personal and organisational pressures when planning workload, recovery and support?

Routage / applicabilité

Universal; no requirement to collect detailed private information.

Impact preuves / audit

Planning guidance, adjustment examples, referral route, protected athlete feedback and calendar/pressure review.

Revue requise

Clinical; lived experience; employment/legal; privacy.

Pages source

25, 33

Modification proposée

Where a transition is foreseeable, support should begin before the person leaves and include simple signposting for health continuity, practical planning, social connection and identity beyond sport. Do not expand this into a large mandatory career-service programme for every organisation.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes the support offered before and during major transitions, including health continuity, practical planning and continued connection?

Routage / applicabilité

Universal, proportionate to the organisation's relationship with the athlete.

Impact preuves / audit

Transition information, timing of offer, signposting and protected feedback.

Revue requise

Lived experience; operational; clinical.

Pages source

61

Modification proposée

Add a selector so disability access, classification changes and declassification can activate targeted expectations rather than remain hidden inside a generic accessibility statement.

Libellé de la question

Does the assessed scope include para-athletes, athletes with disabilities, or athletes whose eligibility may materially change through classification or declassification?

Routage / applicabilité

Always visible; Yes activates RA-13 and Q-R-PARA-P54-05.

Impact preuves / audit

Verify against programme scope and participant categories without collecting unnecessary diagnoses.

Revue requise

Para-athlete lived experience; disability inclusion; legal.

Pages source

61

Modification proposée

Where routed, transition support should address classification changes or declassification, disability-specific access, equipment/logistical disruption, continuity of health support and the possibility of simultaneous adjustment to disability and sporting transition.

Libellé de la question

Which statement best describes how transition support addresses classification changes, declassification and disability-specific access needs?

Routage / applicabilité

Only if CTX-POP-PARA-01 = Yes.

Impact preuves / audit

Accessible transition materials, classification-change route, support examples and protected para-athlete feedback.

Revue requise

Para-athlete lived experience mandatory; clinical; accessibility; legal.

Pages source

61

Modification proposée

Create or update one source record for the IOC Mental Health in Elite Athletes Toolkit (2021) and attach page-level notes to each changed requirement, question, evidence request and auditor prompt.

Libellé de la question

Not applicable.

Routage / applicabilité

All changed records.

Impact preuves / audit

Improves source-to-clause traceability; does not convert an IOC recommendation into automatic MindsMelt policy.

Revue requise

Content governance.

Pages source

25, 27, 33, 35, 37, 49-51, 61, 63, 67

Modification proposée

Do not make routine screening universal. Do not make a named IOC course, recognition tool or assessment tool mandatory. Do not allow coaches or entourage members to diagnose, treat or use risk scores to dismiss concerns. Do not weaken confidentiality or separation from selection.

Libellé de la question

No question change.

Routage / applicabilité

Framework-wide.

Impact preuves / audit

Keep existing clinical, privacy and role-boundary audit controls.

Revue requise

Clinical; privacy/legal; council.

Pages source

37, 63

Modification proposée

Add only the accepted new records, revise the named existing records, regenerate requirement coverage and sitting simulations, and record every change in the review log. The final question count should follow retained constructs and routing rather than a target.

Libellé de la question

Not applicable.

Routage / applicabilité

All accepted changes.

Impact preuves / audit

Re-run coverage, duplication and burden checks.

Revue requise

Content owner; engineering; measurement.

Pages source

Implementation decision